{
  "attribution": "Gardarsdottir, S.O. et al. (2019). Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 2: Cost Analysis. Energies 12, 542. doi:10.3390/en12030542. CC BY 4.0.",
  "description": "How much CO2 capture raises the cost of making clinker in one modelled European cement plant, as the CEMCAP project states it: by 49 to 92 percent, depending on the capture technology.",
  "dimensions": [
    {
      "id": "bound",
      "label": "End of the stated range",
      "values": [
        {"id": "low", "label": "Low end"},
        {"id": "high", "label": "High end"}
      ]
    }
  ],
  "display": {
    "decimals": 0
  },
  "geo_coverage": "global-only",
  "headline_entity": "CEMCAP_REF",
  "id": "green-premium.cemcap-2019.clinker",
  "kind": "published-value",
  "latest": {
    "age_bp": null,
    "dims": {
      "bound": "low"
    },
    "entity": "CEMCAP_REF",
    "period": "2014",
    "status": "final",
    "value": 49.0
  },
  "licence": {
    "name": "CC BY 4.0",
    "spdx": "CC-BY-4.0",
    "url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
  },
  "licence_class": "open",
  "notes": ["Section 4.1, p. 9: \"In general, the cost of clinker increases with 49–92% from the 62.6 €/tclk in the reference cement plant when the investigated CO 2 capture technologies are implemented.\""],
  "notice": null,
  "origins": [
    {"acquisition": "manual", "artifact_id": "article-pdf", "bytes": 2108286, "citation_full": "Gardarsdottir, S.O.; De Lena, E.; Romano, M.; Roussanaly, S.; Voldsund, M.; Pérez-Calvo, J.-F.; Berstad, D.; Fu, C.; Anantharaman, R.; Sutter, D.; Gazzani, M.; Mazzotti, M.; Cinti, G. Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 2: Cost Analysis. Energies 2019, 12, 542. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12030542", "date_accessed": "2026-10-08", "date_published": "2019-02-01", "doi": "10.3390/en12030542", "etag": null, "last_modified": null, "licence": {"name": "CC BY 4.0", "spdx": "CC-BY-4.0", "url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"}, "producer": "Gardarsdottir, De Lena, Romano, Roussanaly, Voldsund, Pérez-Calvo, Berstad, Fu, Anantharaman, Sutter, Gazzani, Mazzotti and Cinti (SINTEF, Politecnico di Milano, ETH Zurich, Italcementi; the CEMCAP project); published in Energies (MDPI)", "r2_url": "https://files.environmentdashboard.org/raw/50f05980ed4f097af1655f3a9160d32c188e11558188f55dfca2a1295b24b94d.zst", "sha256": "50f05980ed4f097af1655f3a9160d32c188e11558188f55dfca2a1295b24b94d", "source_id": "gardarsdottir-2019", "title": "Comparison of technologies for CO2 capture from cement production, part 2, cost analysis (CEMCAP)", "url_download": "https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/server/api/core/bitstreams/b427f6c2-8368-4a12-b35c-80c1661bbc95/content", "url_main": "https://doi.org/10.3390/en12030542", "version_producer": "Energies 12(3), 542 (2019)", "wayback_url": null}
  ],
  "processing": [
    {
      "description": "Read the text of the PDF (sha256 50f05980ed4f…). Found each of the 1 quoted statement(s) word for word on PDF page(s) 10, and the 3 context sentence(s) the scope relies on, before publishing.",
      "inputs": ["50f05980ed4f097af1655f3a9160d32c188e11558188f55dfca2a1295b24b94d"],
      "lock_sha256": "540d352a2533554fbfd8f392b6bae78d1f9332effe729c06b520b2a630450330",
      "script": "pipeline/src/envdash/transforms/action/green_premium.py",
      "transform_sha256": "c2e591e4a0510a3d98f06c52a7bc77fa5e0b4c6d26cf010ec6c7d63920ed91c7"
    },
    {
      "description": "Published each number exactly as printed, with its statement in the value's note. A range 'A-B%' is published as its low end A and high end B (dimension 'bound'); nothing was computed, rounded or combined with any other source.",
      "inputs": ["50f05980ed4f097af1655f3a9160d32c188e11558188f55dfca2a1295b24b94d"],
      "lock_sha256": "540d352a2533554fbfd8f392b6bae78d1f9332effe729c06b520b2a630450330",
      "script": "pipeline/src/envdash/transforms/action/green_premium.py",
      "transform_sha256": "c2e591e4a0510a3d98f06c52a7bc77fa5e0b4c6d26cf010ec6c7d63920ed91c7"
    }
  ],
  "published_value": {
    "document": "gardarsdottir-2019",
    "locator": "Section 4.1, p. 9",
    "quote": "In general, the cost of clinker increases with 49–92% from the 62.6 €/tclk in the reference cement plant when the investigated CO 2 capture technologies are implemented."
  },
  "schema_version": 1,
  "scope": {
    "baseline": null,
    "basis": "One modelled best-available-technology European cement plant (3,000 tonnes of clinker a day, defined by ECRA), without CO2 capture and with each of six capture technologies, on one set of prices: coal 3 euros per gigajoule, electricity 58.1 euros per megawatt-hour, 8% discount rate, 91.3% capacity factor, all costs in 2014 euros, no carbon tax. The reference plant's direct cost is based on IEAGHG estimates. Capture covers most but not all of the plant's emissions. The period is the price base year (2014); the article was published in 2019.",
    "bunkers": null,
    "geography": "A modelled European reference cement plant",
    "gwp": null,
    "lulucf": null
  },
  "superseded_by": null,
  "table": {
    "dims": {
      "bound": ["low", "high"]
    },
    "entity": ["CEMCAP_REF", "CEMCAP_REF"],
    "note": [0, 0],
    "period": ["2014", "2014"],
    "status": ["final", "final"],
    "value": [49.0, 92.0]
  },
  "time_basis": "calendar",
  "title": "Extra cost of cement clinker with CO2 capture, percent (CEMCAP)",
  "unit": {
    "code": "percent",
    "label": "percent more than the conventional route",
    "short": "%"
  },
  "vintage": "Energies 12(3), 542 (2019)"
}